ETHFDUSD

A -29.86% return is a clear loss for ETHFDUSD. The LowMoney configuration was a poor fit for ETHFDUSD during this window. Useful as a negative datapoint: it tells you which parameter combinations to avoid for similar ETHFDUSD market regimes.

About ETHFDUSD: Ethereum sits one tier below Bitcoin in market cap and slightly above it in realised volatility. ETH pairs typically reward strategies that can hold through brief drawdowns to capture larger trend moves.

An 100.0% win rate across 5,992 trades on ETHFDUSD is unusually high. Strategies that win this often typically use small take-profits relative to stop-losses, which works until a single large adverse ETHFDUSD move erases many small wins.

At roughly 16.5 ETHFDUSD trades per day this is a high-frequency configuration -- fee drag and slippage assumptions become critical when extrapolating to live trading on Binance Spot.

The trade payoff distribution is positively skewed -- outsized winners drove the bulk of the result, which is characteristic of trend-capturing modes. Best single trade: 0.0382 USDT. Worst: 0.0245 USDT. Average per trade: 0.0311 USDT.

Risk profile: Per-trade exposure was minimal -- the worst trade only cost 0.00% of starting capital. That low-risk-per-trade footprint is the signature of a tightly-sized configuration; expect smoother equity curves but also slower compounding in strong trend regimes. Best single trade contributed +0.00% to the account, giving a single-trade reward-to-risk ratio of roughly 1.56:1 between the extreme outliers.

About the LowMoney strategy: LowMoney is calibrated for small starting balances -- smaller position sizes, tighter risk controls, fewer parallel orders.

Configuration analysis: The LowMoney configuration entered on a 0.1% pullback signal across 2 potential buy splits at 50 USDT each. Total deployable notional is therefore 100 USDT -- a position-sizing footprint that is defensive at 6% of starting capital -- most of the account stays in stablecoins as buffer. No hard stop-loss is configured -- the strategy relies on take-profit zones and trailing logic instead, which trades smoother behaviour for higher tail-risk in sustained downtrends. Profit is taken in 2 laddered sell zones, which scales out gradually rather than betting on a single exit price -- a structure that smooths returns at the cost of capping the very best winners. Maker/taker fees totalling 15 bps were deducted from every fill, so the headline -29.86% is already net of trading costs -- no additional fee adjustment is required when comparing to other runs.

Over the 364-day test window the strategy generated 186.08 USDT of profit on a 1677 USDT starting balance, growing the account to 1176.22 USDT. Annualised, the -29.86% return over 364 days projects to roughly -29.9% per year -- a pace that would erode capital over time if extrapolated. Crypto market regimes shift quickly, so this projection should be treated as a directional indicator rather than a forecast.