ORDIUSDT

CompletedBeats ORDIUSDT B&H· α +0.48%

LongTimeLongMoreProfit5/26/2026, 9:23:05 PM

ORDIUSDT | 2LongTimeLongMoreProfit.json | 2024-04-24 - 2026-02-25 | -93.79% | 42957 trades | 100% WR

Final Value
620.96 USDT
Return
-93.79%
Profit
+2,821.24 USDT
Trades
42957
Win Rate
100.0%
Open Orders
1448
Best Trade
+0.756991 USDT
Worst Trade
+0.011630 USDT
Max Drawdown
-95.50%
Profit Factor
Sharpe
-0.61
Wins / Losses
42957 / 0
TP / SL / TSL
42957 / 0 / 0
Total Fees
561.00 USDT
Max Streak W/L
42957 / 0
Hold P50 / P95
31m / 3.5d

ORDIUSDT Backtest – unCoded Crypto TradingBot

Strategy: LongTimeLongMoreProfit | Period: 2024-04-24 to 2026-02-25 | Starting Capital: 10,000.00 USDT | Final Value: 620.96 USDT | Return: -93.79% | Trades: 42,957 | Win Rate: 100.0% | Best Trade: 0.7570 USDT | Worst Trade: 0.0116 USDT | Total Profit: 2,821.24 USDT | Max Drawdown: -95.50% | Sharpe Ratio: -0.61 | Total Fees: 561.00 USDT

Detailed Summary

Backtest ORDIUSDT (Mode: 2LongTimeLongMoreProfit.json) Period: 2024-04-24 00:00:01 to 2026-02-25 23:59:59 Starting balance: 10,000.00 USDT Final value: 620.96 USDT P&L: -9,379.04 USDT (-93.79%) Result: LOSS Completed trades: 42957 Open orders at end: 1448 Win rate: 100.0% Avg. profit/trade: 0.065676 USDT Best trade: 0.756991 USDT Worst trade: 0.011630 USDT Total profit (trades only): 2,821.243235 USDT Max drawdown: -95.50% Profit factor: ∞ (no losing trades) Sharpe ratio: -0.61 Total fees: 561.00 USDT Avg hold time: 63.3h TP / SL / TSL: 42957 / 0 / 0 Strategy parameters: Buy trigger: -0.1% from last buy Buy splits: 8 Sell targets: [0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 20.0] Investment per buy: 60.0 USDT Fees: maker 7.5 bps / taker 7.5 bps Elapsed: 4706.8s

Strategy Configuration – LongTimeLongMoreProfit
Buy Trigger: -0.1%
Buy Splits: 8
Investment/Buy: 60 USDT
Start Balance: 10,000.00 USDT
Can Buy Up: Yes
Can Buy Down: No
Stop Loss: No
Maker Fee: 7.5 bps
Taker Fee: 7.5 bps
Tick Size: 0.001
Step Size: 0.01
Min Notional: 5
Intrabar Mode: OLHC
Order Latency: 2s
Cooldown: 1
Sell Zones (8):
+0.25% → 20%+0.5% → 10%+0.75% → 10%+1% → 10%+2.5% → 10%+5% → 25%+10% → 10%+20% → 5%

Performance Analysis

This run produced a -93.79% return on ORDIUSDT — a clear loss in the tested window. Useful primarily as a negative datapoint about parameter combinations that did not fit ORDIUSDT market conditions over these dates.

About ORDIUSDT: ORDIUSDT is a stablecoin-quoted spot pair on Binance. Quote-side liquidity is deep, so slippage assumptions in this backtest map reasonably well to live execution at retail size.

An 100.0% closed-trade win rate across 42,957 closed trades on ORDIUSDT is unusually high. Strategies that win this often typically use small take-profits relative to stop-losses, which works until a single large adverse ORDIUSDT move erases many small wins. This figure covers closed trades only and **excludes 1,448 orders** that were still open at the end of the window.

At roughly 63.8 ORDIUSDT trades per day this is a high-frequency configuration — fee drag and slippage assumptions become critical when extrapolating to live trading on Binance Spot.

The trade payoff distribution is positively skewed — outsized winners drove the bulk of the result, which is characteristic of trend-capturing modes. Best single trade: 0.7570 USDT. Worst: 0.0116 USDT. Average per trade: 0.0657 USDT.

Risk profile (closed trades only): No closed trade ended in a loss in this window — the worst closed trade still finished at +0.00% of starting capital and the best at +0.01%, giving a best-vs-worst ratio of 65.09:1. **This is a closed-trade statistic only:** open positions and unrealized PnL are not reflected in the per-trade min/max, so this should not be read as "the strategy cannot lose". Drawdown on the equity curve and any negative unrealized PnL on still-open positions remain the relevant downside measures.

About the LongTimeLongMoreProfit strategy: LongTimeLongMoreProfit holds positions longer to capture larger swings. It accepts deeper drawdowns in exchange for higher per-trade payoff.

Configuration analysis: The LongTimeLongMoreProfit configuration entered on a 0.1% pullback signal across 8 potential buy splits at 60 USDT each. Total deployable notional is therefore 480 USDT — a position-sizing footprint that is defensive at 5% of starting capital — most of the account stays in stablecoins as buffer. No hard stop-loss is configured — the strategy relies on take-profit zones and trailing logic instead, which trades smoother behaviour for higher tail-risk in sustained downtrends. Profit is taken in 8 laddered sell zones, which scales out gradually rather than betting on a single exit price — a structure that smooths returns at the cost of capping the very best winners. Maker/taker fees totalling 15 bps were deducted from every fill, so the headline -93.79% is already net of trading costs — no additional fee adjustment is required when comparing to other runs.

Over the configured 673-day window the strategy reported 2821.24 USDT of realised trade profit on a 10000 USDT starting balance, ending at a portfolio value of 620.96 USDT. Mechanically annualising the -93.79% window return projects to roughly -77.8% per year — the window covers roughly one full year, so the annualised figure is closer to the realised pace than to an extrapolation, but a single year still represents a single market regime. Treat this number as a unit-conversion of the window result, not as an expected forward return.

Methodology & data

This backtest was executed on historical Binance Spot candles for ORDIUSDT at a base resolution between 1 second and 1 minute (1-second for liquid pairs, 1-minute where finer data is unavailable), with intrabar fill simulation in "OLHC" mode and a synthetic order latency of 2s applied to each fill to approximate real-world routing delay. The simulator processes each base candle sequentially, evaluates the LongTimeLongMoreProfit rule set, and books fills against the next available bar, a standard event-driven backtesting approach that avoids look-ahead bias. Equity is marked-to-market on every closed trade and aggregated into the equity curve shown above.

Configured backtest window: approximately 22.1 months (673 days from `config.from` to `config.to`) of ORDIUSDT price action at 1-second to 1-minute resolution — a sample size that is large enough to span multiple short-term regimes. Note: the equity series may cover fewer days if the engine omits leading or trailing flat periods (e.g. dates before the asset began trading); see the Overview section for the exact equity-coverage span.

Live trading considerations

Translating this result to live trading: ORDIUSDT is a deeply-liquid USDT-quoted pair on Binance, so the simulated fills here translate well to live execution at retail size. The high trade frequency means cumulative slippage and exchange-side latency will erode a few percent of the headline return over a full year — budget for that gap. Without a hard stop-loss, the live system depends on the take-profit ladder firing during recovery legs; a prolonged downtrend without recovery will hold positions open longer than backtest aggregates suggest. Additionally, exchange downtime, API rate limits, and funding-rate changes (on perp variants) are not modelled here and should be accounted for in production deployment.

Frequently asked questions

Is a -93.79% return on ORDIUSDT a good backtest result?
Yes. More importantly, it beat a simple buy-and-hold of ORDIUSDT (-94.27%) over the same window by +0.48% of alpha, which is the bar that actually matters for an automated strategy.
What does the 100.0% win rate mean here?
It means 100.0 out of every 100 closed trades ended profitable. Frequent wins are emotionally easier to operate but say nothing about size — one large loss can offset many small wins.
What is the annualised return for this ORDIUSDT backtest?
If the -93.79% over 673 days continued at the same rate, it would extrapolate to roughly -77.8% per year. This is a hypothetical directional indicator, not a forecast — crypto regimes change, and strategies rarely sustain peak performance year-over-year.
Can I run this exact LongTimeLongMoreProfit configuration live?
The configuration shown in the Strategy Configuration block is the same JSON schema the live unCoded TradingBot consumes, so it can be loaded into a live instance. That is a technical compatibility statement, not a recommendation: a passing backtest is necessary but not sufficient evidence that a configuration will be profitable in live trading. Before any live use, validate on an out-of-sample window, paper-trade it, confirm exchange-side fees match the simulated 7.5/7.5 bps, and start with a position size well below the backtested capital to absorb live slippage and execution differences.
How is this backtest different from others on ORDIUSDT?
Every run on the platform uses the same intrabar-fill engine and historical Binance Spot data, so the comparison is apples-to-apples. What differs between runs is the LongTimeLongMoreProfit parameter set (buy trigger, sell zones, splits, stop-loss) and the time window — both are visible above so you can rerun, tune, or fork this configuration.

This interpretation is generated deterministically from this run's own metrics. Past performance is not indicative of future results — a profitable backtest is necessary but not sufficient evidence that a strategy will work in live trading on ORDIUSDT.

Loading equity data...

Daily Summary

Loading daily summary...