PONDUSDT

CompletedLoses to PONDUSDT B&H· α -53.22%

LongTimeLong5/26/2026, 9:20:59 PM

PONDUSDT | 3LongTimeLong.json | 2023-01-01 - 2023-12-31 | +40.45% | 115172 trades | 100% WR

Final Value
14045.43 USDT
Return
+40.45%
Profit
+4,022.97 USDT
Trades
115172
Win Rate
100.0%
Open Orders
611
Best Trade
+0.149631 USDT
Worst Trade
+0.011978 USDT
Max Drawdown
-15.75%
Profit Factor
Sharpe
1.34
Wins / Losses
115172 / 0
TP / SL / TSL
115172 / 0 / 0
Total Fees
1434.03 USDT
Max Streak W/L
115172 / 0
Hold P50 / P95
37m / 4.3d

PONDUSDT Backtest – unCoded Crypto TradingBot

Strategy: LongTimeLong | Period: 2023-01-01 to 2023-12-31 | Starting Capital: 10,000.00 USDT | Final Value: 14,045.43 USDT | Return: +40.45% | Trades: 115,172 | Win Rate: 100.0% | Best Trade: 0.1496 USDT | Worst Trade: 0.0120 USDT | Total Profit: +4,022.97 USDT | Max Drawdown: -15.75% | Sharpe Ratio: 1.34 | Total Fees: 1,434.03 USDT

Detailed Summary

Backtest PONDUSDT (Mode: 3LongTimeLong.json) Period: 2023-01-01 00:00:01 to 2023-12-31 23:59:59 Starting balance: 10,000.00 USDT Final value: 14,045.43 USDT P&L: +4,045.43 USDT (+40.45%) Result: PROFIT Completed trades: 115172 Open orders at end: 611 Win rate: 100.0% Avg. profit/trade: 0.034930 USDT Best trade: 0.149631 USDT Worst trade: 0.011978 USDT Total profit (trades only): 4,022.972831 USDT Max drawdown: -15.75% Profit factor: ∞ (no losing trades) Sharpe ratio: 1.34 Total fees: 1,434.03 USDT Avg hold time: 43.3h TP / SL / TSL: 115172 / 0 / 0 Strategy parameters: Buy trigger: -0.1% from last buy Buy splits: 9 Sell targets: [0.25, 0.35, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0, 10.0, 15.0] Investment per buy: 60.0 USDT Fees: maker 7.5 bps / taker 7.5 bps Elapsed: 1137.3s

Strategy Configuration – LongTimeLong
Buy Trigger: -0.1%
Buy Splits: 9
Investment/Buy: 60 USDT
Start Balance: 10,000.00 USDT
Can Buy Up: Yes
Can Buy Down: No
Stop Loss: No
Maker Fee: 7.5 bps
Taker Fee: 7.5 bps
Tick Size: 0.00001
Step Size: 1
Min Notional: 5
Intrabar Mode: OLHC
Order Latency: 2s
Cooldown: 1
Sell Zones (9):
+0.25% → 20%+0.35% → 15%+0.5% → 10%+0.75% → 10%+1% → 10%+2.5% → 10%+5% → 5%+10% → 5%+15% → 5%

Performance Analysis

The LongTimeLong configuration produced a 40.45% return on PONDUSDT in the tested window. This is a positive single-window result; a like-for-like comparison against buy-and-hold of PONDUSDT over the same dates is required to judge whether the strategy added value beyond the underlying price move.

About PONDUSDT: PONDUSDT is a stablecoin-quoted spot pair on Binance. Quote-side liquidity is deep, so slippage assumptions in this backtest map reasonably well to live execution at retail size.

An 100.0% closed-trade win rate across 115,172 closed trades on PONDUSDT is unusually high. Strategies that win this often typically use small take-profits relative to stop-losses, which works until a single large adverse PONDUSDT move erases many small wins. This figure covers closed trades only and **excludes 611 orders** that were still open at the end of the window.

At roughly 315.5 PONDUSDT trades per day this is a high-frequency configuration — fee drag and slippage assumptions become critical when extrapolating to live trading on Binance Spot.

The trade payoff distribution is positively skewed — outsized winners drove the bulk of the result, which is characteristic of trend-capturing modes. Best single trade: 0.1496 USDT. Worst: 0.0120 USDT. Average per trade: 0.0349 USDT.

Risk profile (closed trades only): No closed trade ended in a loss in this window — the worst closed trade still finished at +0.00% of starting capital and the best at +0.00%, giving a best-vs-worst ratio of 12.49:1. **This is a closed-trade statistic only:** open positions and unrealized PnL are not reflected in the per-trade min/max, so this should not be read as "the strategy cannot lose". Drawdown on the equity curve and any negative unrealized PnL on still-open positions remain the relevant downside measures.

About the LongTimeLong strategy: LongTimeLongMoreProfit holds positions longer to capture larger swings. It accepts deeper drawdowns in exchange for higher per-trade payoff.

Configuration analysis: The LongTimeLong configuration entered on a 0.1% pullback signal across 9 potential buy splits at 60 USDT each. Total deployable notional is therefore 540 USDT — a position-sizing footprint that is defensive at 5% of starting capital — most of the account stays in stablecoins as buffer. No hard stop-loss is configured — the strategy relies on take-profit zones and trailing logic instead, which trades smoother behaviour for higher tail-risk in sustained downtrends. Profit is taken in 9 laddered sell zones, which scales out gradually rather than betting on a single exit price — a structure that smooths returns at the cost of capping the very best winners. Maker/taker fees totalling 15 bps were deducted from every fill, so the headline 40.45% is already net of trading costs — no additional fee adjustment is required when comparing to other runs.

Over the configured 365-day window the strategy reported 4022.97 USDT of realised trade profit on a 10000 USDT starting balance, ending at a portfolio value of 14045.43 USDT. Mechanically annualising the 40.45% window return projects to roughly +40.5% per year — the window covers roughly one full year, so the annualised figure is closer to the realised pace than to an extrapolation, but a single year still represents a single market regime. Treat this number as a unit-conversion of the window result, not as an expected forward return.

Methodology & data

This backtest was executed on historical Binance Spot candles for PONDUSDT at a base resolution between 1 second and 1 minute (1-second for liquid pairs, 1-minute where finer data is unavailable), with intrabar fill simulation in "OLHC" mode and a synthetic order latency of 2s applied to each fill to approximate real-world routing delay. The simulator processes each base candle sequentially, evaluates the LongTimeLong rule set, and books fills against the next available bar, a standard event-driven backtesting approach that avoids look-ahead bias. Equity is marked-to-market on every closed trade and aggregated into the equity curve shown above.

Configured backtest window: approximately 12.0 months (365 days from `config.from` to `config.to`) of PONDUSDT price action at 1-second to 1-minute resolution — a sample size that is large enough to span multiple short-term regimes. Note: the equity series may cover fewer days if the engine omits leading or trailing flat periods (e.g. dates before the asset began trading); see the Overview section for the exact equity-coverage span.

Live trading considerations

Translating this result to live trading: PONDUSDT is a deeply-liquid USDT-quoted pair on Binance, so the simulated fills here translate well to live execution at retail size. The high trade frequency means cumulative slippage and exchange-side latency will erode a few percent of the headline return over a full year — budget for that gap. Without a hard stop-loss, the live system depends on the take-profit ladder firing during recovery legs; a prolonged downtrend without recovery will hold positions open longer than backtest aggregates suggest. Additionally, exchange downtime, API rate limits, and funding-rate changes (on perp variants) are not modelled here and should be accounted for in production deployment.

Frequently asked questions

Is a 40.45% return on PONDUSDT a good backtest result?
Not on its own. The 40.45% return looks strong in isolation, but simply holding PONDUSDT over the same window returned +93.68%, so this configuration underperformed buy-and-hold by -53.22% (negative alpha). A high headline return is not a good result when holding the coin would have done better.
What does the 100.0% win rate mean here?
It means 100.0 out of every 100 closed trades ended profitable. Frequent wins are emotionally easier to operate but say nothing about size — one large loss can offset many small wins.
What is the annualised return for this PONDUSDT backtest?
This backtest already covers about a full year (365 days), so the annualised figure is essentially the total return of 40.45% itself, not a projection. A single year is not predictive of future years.
Can I run this exact LongTimeLong configuration live?
The configuration shown in the Strategy Configuration block is the same JSON schema the live unCoded TradingBot consumes, so it can be loaded into a live instance. That is a technical compatibility statement, not a recommendation: a passing backtest is necessary but not sufficient evidence that a configuration will be profitable in live trading. Before any live use, validate on an out-of-sample window, paper-trade it, confirm exchange-side fees match the simulated 7.5/7.5 bps, and start with a position size well below the backtested capital to absorb live slippage and execution differences.
How is this backtest different from others on PONDUSDT?
Every run on the platform uses the same intrabar-fill engine and historical Binance Spot data, so the comparison is apples-to-apples. What differs between runs is the LongTimeLong parameter set (buy trigger, sell zones, splits, stop-loss) and the time window — both are visible above so you can rerun, tune, or fork this configuration.

This interpretation is generated deterministically from this run's own metrics. Past performance is not indicative of future results — a profitable backtest is necessary but not sufficient evidence that a strategy will work in live trading on PONDUSDT.

Loading equity data...

Daily Summary

Loading daily summary...