QUICKUSDT BasicMode 2021 Backtest

CompletedBeats QUICKUSDT B&H· α +0.32%

BasicMode4/26/2026, 3:55:29 PM

QUICKUSDT | 4BasicMode.json | 2021-01-01 - 2021-12-31 | -58.28% | 197 trades | 100% WR

Final Value
4172.24 USDT
Return
-58.28%
Profit
+1,041.08 USDT
Trades
197
Win Rate
100.0%
Open Orders
20
Best Trade
+40.264099 USDT
Worst Trade
+0.747454 USDT
Max Drawdown
-71.12%
Profit Factor
Sharpe
-0.75
Wins / Losses
197 / 0
TP / SL / TSL
197 / 0 / 0
Total Fees
236.52 USDT
Max Streak W/L
197 / 0
Hold P50 / P95
1m / 9.2h

QUICKUSDT Backtest – unCoded Crypto TradingBot

Strategy: BasicMode | Period: 2021-01-01 to 2021-12-31 | Starting Capital: 10,000.00 USDT | Final Value: 4,172.24 USDT | Return: -58.28% | Trades: 197 | Win Rate: 100.0% | Best Trade: 40.2641 USDT | Worst Trade: 0.7475 USDT | Total Profit: 1,041.08 USDT | Max Drawdown: -71.12% | Sharpe Ratio: -0.75 | Total Fees: 236.52 USDT

Detailed Summary

Backtest QUICKUSDT (Mode: 4BasicMode.json) Period: 2021-01-01 00:00:01 to 2021-12-31 23:59:59 Starting balance: 10,000.00 USDT Final value: 4,172.24 USDT P&L: -5,827.76 USDT (-58.28%) Result: LOSS Completed trades: 197 Open orders at end: 20 Win rate: 100.0% Avg. profit/trade: 5.284675 USDT Best trade: 40.264099 USDT Worst trade: 0.747454 USDT Total profit (trades only): 1,041.080900 USDT Strategy parameters: Buy trigger: -0.1% from last buy Buy splits: 7 Sell targets: [0.25, 0.35, 0.5, 0.75, 1.0, 2.5, 5.0] Investment per buy: 50.0 USDT Fees: maker 7.5 bps / taker 7.5 bps Elapsed: 25.0s

Strategy Configuration – BasicMode
Buy Trigger: -0.1%
Buy Splits: 7
Investment/Buy: 50 USDT
Start Balance: 10,000.00 USDT
Percent Mode: No
Free Quote %: 1.00%
Min Investment/Quote: 20 USDT
Min Quote Balance: 1 USDT
Can Buy: Yes
Can Buy Up: Yes
Can Buy Down: No
Can Sell: Yes
Stop Loss: No
Maker Fee: 7.5 bps
Taker Fee: 7.5 bps
Assumed Spread: 0 bps
Fees in Quote: Yes
Tick Size: 0.00001
Step Size: 1
Min Notional: 5
Intrabar Mode: OLHC
Order Latency: 2s
Cooldown: 1
Sell Activate Dist: 0.1%
Sell Cancel Dist: 1%
Sell Zones (7):
+0.25% → 25%+0.35% → 15%+0.5% → 15%+0.75% → 15%+1% → 10%+2.5% → 10%+5% → 10%

Performance Analysis

This run produced a -58.28% return on QUICKUSDT — a clear loss in the tested window. Useful primarily as a negative datapoint about parameter combinations that did not fit QUICKUSDT market conditions over these dates.

About QUICKUSDT: QUICKUSDT is a stablecoin-quoted spot pair on Binance. Quote-side liquidity is deep, so slippage assumptions in this backtest map reasonably well to live execution at retail size.

An 100.0% closed-trade win rate across 197 closed trades on QUICKUSDT is unusually high. Strategies that win this often typically use small take-profits relative to stop-losses, which works until a single large adverse QUICKUSDT move erases many small wins. This figure covers closed trades only and **excludes 20 orders** that were still open at the end of the window.

Trade frequency of about 0.54 QUICKUSDT trades per day is conservative — the bot waits for higher-quality setups, trading roughly 13 times a week.

The trade payoff distribution is positively skewed — outsized winners drove the bulk of the result, which is characteristic of trend-capturing modes. Best single trade: 40.2641 USDT. Worst: 0.7475 USDT. Average per trade: 5.2847 USDT.

Risk profile (closed trades only): No closed trade ended in a loss in this window — the worst closed trade still finished at +0.01% of starting capital and the best at +0.40%, giving a best-vs-worst ratio of 53.87:1. **This is a closed-trade statistic only:** open positions and unrealized PnL are not reflected in the per-trade min/max, so this should not be read as "the strategy cannot lose". Drawdown on the equity curve and any negative unrealized PnL on still-open positions remain the relevant downside measures.

About the BasicMode strategy: BasicMode is the balanced reference configuration — moderate position sizing, standard take-profit and stop-loss bands. It's the baseline against which other modes are compared.

Configuration analysis: The BasicMode configuration entered on a 0.1% pullback signal across 7 potential buy splits at 50 USDT each. Total deployable notional is therefore 350 USDT — a position-sizing footprint that is defensive at 4% of starting capital — most of the account stays in stablecoins as buffer. No hard stop-loss is configured — the strategy relies on take-profit zones and trailing logic instead, which trades smoother behaviour for higher tail-risk in sustained downtrends. Profit is taken in 7 laddered sell zones, which scales out gradually rather than betting on a single exit price — a structure that smooths returns at the cost of capping the very best winners. Maker/taker fees totalling 15 bps were deducted from every fill, so the headline -58.28% is already net of trading costs — no additional fee adjustment is required when comparing to other runs.

Over the configured 365-day window the strategy reported 1041.08 USDT of realised trade profit on a 10000 USDT starting balance, ending at a portfolio value of 4172.24 USDT. Mechanically annualising the -58.28% window return projects to roughly -58.3% per year — the window covers roughly one full year, so the annualised figure is closer to the realised pace than to an extrapolation, but a single year still represents a single market regime. Treat this number as a unit-conversion of the window result, not as an expected forward return.

Methodology & data

This backtest was executed on historical Binance Spot candles for QUICKUSDT at a base resolution between 1 second and 1 minute (1-second for liquid pairs, 1-minute where finer data is unavailable), with intrabar fill simulation in "OLHC" mode and a synthetic order latency of 2s applied to each fill to approximate real-world routing delay. The simulator processes each base candle sequentially, evaluates the BasicMode rule set, and books fills against the next available bar, a standard event-driven backtesting approach that avoids look-ahead bias. Equity is marked-to-market on every closed trade and aggregated into the equity curve shown above.

Configured backtest window: approximately 12.0 months (365 days from `config.from` to `config.to`) of QUICKUSDT price action at 1-second to 1-minute resolution — a sample size that is large enough to span multiple short-term regimes. Note: the equity series may cover fewer days if the engine omits leading or trailing flat periods (e.g. dates before the asset began trading); see the Overview section for the exact equity-coverage span.

Live trading considerations

Translating this result to live trading: QUICKUSDT is a deeply-liquid USDT-quoted pair on Binance, so the simulated fills here translate well to live execution at retail size. Lower trade frequency keeps slippage drag minimal, so live results should track the backtest more closely than a high-frequency configuration would. Without a hard stop-loss, the live system depends on the take-profit ladder firing during recovery legs; a prolonged downtrend without recovery will hold positions open longer than backtest aggregates suggest. Additionally, exchange downtime, API rate limits, and funding-rate changes (on perp variants) are not modelled here and should be accounted for in production deployment.

Frequently asked questions

Is a -58.28% return on QUICKUSDT a good backtest result?
Yes. More importantly, it beat a simple buy-and-hold of QUICKUSDT (-58.59%) over the same window by +0.32% of alpha, which is the bar that actually matters for an automated strategy.
What does the 100.0% win rate mean here?
It means 100.0 out of every 100 closed trades ended profitable. Frequent wins are emotionally easier to operate but say nothing about size — one large loss can offset many small wins.
What is the annualised return for this QUICKUSDT backtest?
This backtest already covers about a full year (365 days), so the annualised figure is essentially the total return of -58.28% itself, not a projection. A single year is not predictive of future years.
Can I run this exact BasicMode configuration live?
The configuration shown in the Strategy Configuration block is the same JSON schema the live unCoded TradingBot consumes, so it can be loaded into a live instance. That is a technical compatibility statement, not a recommendation: a passing backtest is necessary but not sufficient evidence that a configuration will be profitable in live trading. Before any live use, validate on an out-of-sample window, paper-trade it, confirm exchange-side fees match the simulated 7.5/7.5 bps, and start with a position size well below the backtested capital to absorb live slippage and execution differences.
How is this backtest different from others on QUICKUSDT?
Every run on the platform uses the same intrabar-fill engine and historical Binance Spot data, so the comparison is apples-to-apples. What differs between runs is the BasicMode parameter set (buy trigger, sell zones, splits, stop-loss) and the time window — both are visible above so you can rerun, tune, or fork this configuration.

This interpretation is generated deterministically from this run's own metrics. Past performance is not indicative of future results — a profitable backtest is necessary but not sufficient evidence that a strategy will work in live trading on QUICKUSDT.

Loading equity data...

Trades

0 Trades

0 abgeschlossene Trades – unCoded Crypto TradingBot Backtest
#TypKaufVerkaufMengeProfit%Kauf-ZeitVerkauf-ZeitFee
Loading...